Son, for the millionth time: Why can't we donate to Hillary Clinton's campaign? Please?
Dad, for the 999,999th time: We can't! We are foreign nationals. We
don't want to put Hillary in trouble, remember? Even a cent from three
insignificant Canadians will spell trouble for her. Besides, you are just 10 years old!
Son, crestfallen: Ummm, why are they so unfair?
Mom: OK, buddy, I'll buy a 'Hillary for President' bumper sticker, OK?
Son: Oh, and can we also buy lawn signs?
Dad: OK, we'll do that.
[Silence, blessed silence, for a few, fleeting moments]
Then a light goes off in son's head: Can my sisters contribute to Hillary's campaign? They were born here.
Dad: Oh no, this guy has found a loophole now!
******
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
My Son, My Very Own Canadian for Clinton
Sunday, November 22, 2015
Name a country in Europe
My son, Rahul, who was a toddler when I started this blog, is now 9 years old, loves live theatre and music, and cannot decide whether he wants to be a veterinarian (like his mother) or a musician (like his idol Paul McCartney) or both. [Word of advice from mom: Just focus on becoming Paul McCartney, kiddo!]
But this fall he surprised himself and us all by writing comedy like his dad does. In fact, he went a step further than dad by actually enjoying being on stage. Here is the skit Rahul wrote and performed this week together with his theatre class, Act Two Comedy Troupe. His teacher, Tamara Kist, edited the skit big time and deserves credit for the final version, while dad, Melvin, gets some credit for helping with first draft.
Teacher: Yes, it's a country. Unfortunately, it is not in Europe.
Monday, February 16, 2015
Madhuri Shekhar's 'A Nice Indian Boy.'
Here is the best thing I can say about how good the play 'A Nice Indian Boy' was: that I went to see it twice.
The first time, on Valentine's Day, on my own, because it was rated PG-13 and because we have no friends or babysitters here yet that we can request taking care of our kids while we take some time on our own -- like a normal, parental couple would. So Melvin's Valentine's Day gift for me was to drop me off at Victory Gardens, take the kids for a treat in a nearby bakery and pick me up again after the show. So pushing the guilt aside, I grabbed a 'Mumbai mule' from the lovely bar downstairs at Victory Gardens and headed up to the show -- telling myself that I love live theatre and it keeps me sane and connected in my isolated 'all work and no play' (pun intended) world.
It was quickly obvious that the play's PG-13 rating does not apply to Melvin's or my values and sensibilities and that this could have been a family outing for us. Adding to my regret was the fact that another extended family in the audience had brought along some kids -- and at least two appeared to be of my girls' ages (pre-teens). Two more appeared to be in their teens. I texted to my family during intermission that we are coming back again. Together. Melvin's response was 'huh?'
So we went back again yesterday-- February 15th. I gave a crash course to my kids on DDLJ (which is referred to quite a bit in some scenes), Mumbai's cosmopolitan Marathis, Ganesha, Indian stereotypes, parental magnanimity, sibling rivalry, sibling love and support, liberal values, first generation immigrant parents' idiosyncracies, second generation's insularity, first generation's expectations of second generation's behaviors towards them. And finally, the elephant in the room and it is what you think (if you clicked on the link above) but it is also not what you think. It is not even Ganesha who as a deity has a huge presence in the play. It is the Indian's expectations about who is a true or a good, natural-born Indian and this little-discussed -- perhaps light-hearted but perhaps not -- reverse "discrimination". I also told them not to be shy about a very explicit kissing scene, putting it in context thus: "I allow you to watch Western movies where men kill men with one fast-drawn gun. If you are allowed to watch that, you can see this without any doubt." I warned them that on a couple occasions they will hear some swear words -- but nothing that they haven't already heard on their school grounds or from my mouth when I am really mad about something. (Yes, so I said it out loud and publicly. Now flog me.) Whether the crash course helped or not, I cannot be sure; whether the kids followed every dialog or understood every issue, of that too I cannot be sure (my kids' ages range from 8 to 12). But of this I am sure: that the big-picture impact of this beautiful, sensitive, witty, clever play will only make them more self-assured Indian American children and better human beings overall. That the play emphasizes the triumph of love and mutual respect for all -- whether separated by race, community or sexual orientation -- and by all -- whether by parents or progeny; brown or white -- is what they would ultimately remember. Of that I am sure.
The California-based playwright Madhuri Shekhar (Chennai roots) appears to be talented and extremely insightful. All the actors were amazing -- but Alka Nayyar and Kamal Hans, even more so. Perhaps, they were just a tad older and much more experienced as actors, but they commanded the stage, even more so than the actors who played the younger characters (Kaiser Ahmed, Riley McIlveen, Suzan Faycurry).
If you have a chance to see this Rasaka Theatre production, please do so. Or better still, perform this play in your local community. It is a lovely, lovely play.
Director, Anna Bahow, on the play and the playwright: 'A Nice Indian Boy' is a romantic comedy with familiar tropes -- that are anything but familiar when immigrant assimilation collides with the adoption of a foreign heritage. The play challenges our traditioal concepts of ethnicity ad marriage. Shekhar has such respect for her characters and the humor is generous to all.
Thursday, January 1, 2015
Goodbye Sam, Hello Samantha!
As a painfully shy kid with no brothers or boy cousins and with little chance of meeting and interacting boys, as I had gone to an all-girls' school, I was both curious about boys and scared of them. They were aliens as far as I was concerned. So when I heard Cliff Richard's song 'Goodbye Sam, hello Samantha' in my teens in the '80s, I loved it! The song validated and put into perspective my own ignorance of matters of the opposite sex, albeit in a 180 degree manner. I dug it up yesterday when my children -- two pre-teen girls and a boy -- were having a friendly girls vs. boys argument. As expected, there were giggles, incredulous looks, 'what? no waaayyyy!' type of protests. They are still at an age when it is hard to imagine that a member of the opposite sex will really, truly steal you away from everything that matters to you and your kind -- whatever that means in this somewhat (relatively speaking) post-gender segregation era.
Then this afternoon, my husband got in on the family conversation, which by now is about the song itself rather than about the mysteries of the opposite sex. There is a lot of humor embedded in this song, is the obvious adult consensus. (Of course, the kids can't deny that either, as evidenced by the giggles of a particular eight-year old.) Additionally, my husband thinks it is a song that may have raised no eyebrows then, but perhaps would be considered as too earnest, too innocent, too cheesy, no street cred whatsoever. It is so straightforward and simple in its innocence and therefore would not do an easy cakewalk in our more-cynical times. He may have a point. We came up with two more songs that sound like they will be subjected to some scrutiny in today's world, even though they are both full of light-hearted humor. Here are those songs:
'Save all your kisses for me' by Brotherhood of man.
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Kid speak -- Part One
Divya: Rahul, you put water in my eye!
Rahul: Well, just spit it out of your eye!
Mom (fascinated): Spit it out?
Rahul (correcting self): Well, just drop it out of your eye, Divya!
****
Rahul had his hand on the window (glass) of the car and was pressing the power-window button up, down, up, down, with the other.
Mom: Whatcha doin', Rahul?
Rahul: Nothing. Just giving my hand a ride.
****
Rahul: Is a documentary a dictionary on TV?
****
Divya: Are people the best animals?
****
Rahul (at 6 years of age): You look too cool, Mommy. Like a rock star!
****
Dad (loading the dishwasher): Rahul, can you bring the glasses from the living room?
Rahul (cheekily) brings his eye glasses that he hates to wear.
****
Lekha: Do you want pepperoni? Or pepper only?
****
Divya: If you eat yourself, will you be inside out?
****
Rahul (at 5&1/2 years of age; impatient for Mom's attention to turn to him): It is boring to hear about Lekha's and Divya's dreams. It is fun when you listen to my dreams.
****
Rahul: Is that a thinking job or a doing job?
****
Rahul: What is that thing in the hotel room that you and Daddy kept your computer?
Mom: A safe?
Rahul: Yes, and I think my memory is in a safe.
****
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Looking at the NCERT cartoon controversy through the prism of class
So much has been said – in
English – about the lack of a sense of humour in Dravidian Tamils by reader-commenters in the English newspaper, 'The Hindu,' and commentators elsewhere.
However, few have understood how the anti-Hindi protests of 1965 aimed to bridge the gap between the socioeconomic classes by opening up access to
the English language in Tamil Nadu and beyond. Fewer have connected how, by not illustrating this nuanced principle and urgent strategy for better economic prospects, the cartoon does a disservice to the protesters and to the history of Tamil Nadu . Instead, those who opened the doors are discussed, by some Tamils and non-Tamils alike, as uncouth trouble-makers with nothing more than political self-interests. So much have we advanced since
those days when English was available mostly to the elites; so much have we
taken for granted the middle- and working-classes' economic potential in the English-speaking world!
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Humor: Why can't I have an Amy Chua day?
I thought I'll pull an Amy Chua today when I realized my girls are, on average, repeating each level of their swimming classes twice. Twice! On average! Which means sometimes it is as high as 4 or 5. So I threatened to drown their pillow pets and ordered them to stay in the pool for 10 hours or as long as it takes to get their hand-leg-breathing coordination, pronto! And no bathroom breaks! So first hour was easy. Second hour, not bad. Third hour they called Child & Family Services on me. And CFS refused to accept my explanation that I am tired of signing them up for the same class over and over again. Since I'm not at Yale, they said, I can afford to sign my Tuesday evenings away forever, watching my kids dog-paddle.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Smoke and Mirrors
This funny video, 'How to gift wrap a cat' brings home to me how all of life is smoke and mirrors.
With different background music and normal film speed, we could have, very easily, been led to believe that the cat thinks he is being dressed for coronation.
But a life built on illusions may not be as bad as it sounds--we live it everyday, at different levels, and for the most part, with good intentions. Sometimes we are not even aware of the illusions we have accepted as part of our life. Even in this video, both man and cat may well be deceiving each other, but both are symbiotically happy. And perhaps, that's all that matters in the end.
